Saturday 16 September 2023

Impetus Rules - Mohacs 1526, part 8 - Hungarian Clipeati and Armati in 20mm


Extra Impetus Nº3 mentions 4 heavy infantry stands each of Clipeati and Armati for a sizeable Hungarian army of the Mohacs period. The problem here is that generally the Clipeati formed the shield wall from were the Armati, probably armed with pole weapons, would fight in a somewhat tight phalanx. The extra Impetus separates both types of heavy infantry but I prefer to use them together in the same stand. In the future, if I see my life in danger in a game or so, I can always divide the stands differently between Clipeati and Armati. 


The Clipeati and Armati figures really look nice together and you can deepen the Impetus spirit of nice big  stands that look like dioramas. 


The figures used are some very nice Caesar copies ordered from China through Aliexpress. For just some 3 euros you get 200 1/72 figures in a poly bag which is obviously a great value for value. The plastic is harder than poly figures and paints and hold the paint very well. The figures were copied from some of the figures of the two boxes of  Caesar XIII and XV century Medieval European Knights. I only used here the ones from the XV century as they are closer to the Hungarian heavy infantry of 1526, even if not a match as there were also some different helmets and pieces of equipment on those days Hungarian army. As pole weapons are necessary for the Armati many of the figures were converted as pikemen. In the above picture you can see the original figure (armed with sword or an halberd) sided with the converted one armed with a pike plastic made of a broom stick. Many of the halberdiers were left with its weapon as its a very probable weapon of the Armati. 


I left all Clipeati armed with swords just because they look as if they are somehow dealing with the shield. The shields were made of slightly curved plastic from 1lt yogurt buckets. This is an highly simplified form of the shield as generally the heavy infantry Hungarian shield had a vertical boss all along. They were colored with photocopies (the ones red chequered or with the Hungarian coat of arms) or hand painted like the tri colored ones. 


The back of the shields were painted brown and were kept standing just with one piece of plastic. Not sure if one or two legs hold these pavesi type of shields but like this it became simpler. 


Another 4 stands of archers were also made in order to finish the 8 that are mentioned in the lists. The flag of this one came from the Russian XIX century Opolchenie. Not the happiest union as there aren't many orthodox people in Hungary.  

Next: Maybe a return to the nowadays Russo-Ukrainian war. 

11 comments:

  1. Superb work and those pavises and flags really make the whole force stand out:)!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Steve. The pavises and the flags are really the force driving this figures build up.

      Delete
  2. A very good looking army. The shields and flags certainly make it stand out.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Peter. You can have a scruffy paint job in the figures that the shields and flags will hide it :)

      Delete
  3. More impressive conversions Joao.
    Neil

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Neil. These conversions are very pleasant to do and being a few hundred kms from England forces you to do these kind of things.

      Delete
    2. Joao,
      Re a previous post:

      https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/394879611680?hash=item5bf0a8b320:g:7-wAAOSw7Z1lCw34&amdata=enc%3AAQAIAAAA4GQ65EbrEdDeo%2BI5XmhReJf8BWb2sGViyyd4dPpCU9c14SOgJCDLrBAg2HM1ea%2BWTjt2WSH9uyB92UhbbdGxlh6001L%2BrgLJHVfKf5pSlTNYlFQxbmgiFL5Pd1NFRRCTtBig9TCQJ7MrLOpS6Y7xZHKZvMzSEvKAoH%2BeQXd7nH9h4%2BfCBBw2ZuaBQcqjDwE6oxsm4yGtU2ur49iBRfb%2B2Ycgnv4kfqO3X6CjUJkm2knQEVPn98fTMGrv0wzV1Y8UAj%2FkZRIeEX04lMbfuR9NG1vC2JeOhB3UyTysSRC2SXNQ%7Ctkp%3ABk9SR9ry-brWYg

      Neil

      Delete
    3. Great finding, thanks. And very close :)

      Delete
  4. Muito bom. Pena a falta de tempo para uns jogos. 👍👍

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete